Bin Hu and India: Public mayor elected to comply with procedures in the name of fake public opinion

The public is not particularly concerned about the elected officials have the right of future generations. After the public officials concerned about is that even if elected, he should follow the basic procedure to achieve a minimum of procedural justice. In other words, Gushi County, even if the particular want government officials to share even after the election of rights, but also should design a set of image point kind of procedures to allow the public a sense of participation, see the past, think it is useful to do with their relationship.



Author: Bin Hu India



Gushi County, Henan Province in 2008, the selection Zheng Keji county officials and county bureau-level cadres appointments, the "open" selection of the township and village heads (Zheng Keji) cadres, the cadres, mostly children and the two county real estate the boss's relatives. Gushi County Standing Committee, the Organization Department of Hui Zhou acknowledged that the public elected the last 12 village chiefs and indeed, after mostly government officials. The Ministers of the Organization said: "They have been elected terms, should elected officials have no right after it?" ( "Guangzhou Daily" August 25)



Questioned by the public a clear-cut: how the public and elected officials, village chiefs actually mostly children? The Ministers of the Organization's response and forcefully: the children of eligible officials, should have no right to election to begin? This dispute is not likely to have a clear conclusion. Because in the public election of Gushi County, township and village heads on this matter, we are the Government's wish to see more freedom of expression, public opinion is so thin, so can only be cynical in a way to express their dissatisfaction.



Gushi County, according to the interpretation of, this election is divided into three steps to the public, the first step, consistent with 43 years of age, Ren Fu Keji two years or more conditions such as recommend yourself out of more than 270 last Zijian. The second step, after the county department level, Zheng Keji on behalf of veteran cadres, there are more than 300 people voted, and launch more than 60 people. The third step, after several days of inspection, the Standing Committee and other officials from the county more than 50 people vote for mayor the last 12. We see that the first step the time being could not see any, are eligible to enter the big list of people who are cadres above the county Fu Keji basically see a portion; lies in the second step, third step, if there The so-called tricky words, but also these two steps. 300 people voting group are those people? The old and new leadership. Such a program designed from the start to play inside in the official groups around in circles, circling circle. The last election who is not a bureaucracy in the various forces game winner, is the elite who split up the spoils game winners, and "public opinion" has nothing to do.



I think the public is not particularly concerned about the elected officials have the right of future generations. After the public officials concerned about is that even if elected, he should follow the basic procedure to achieve a minimum of procedural justice. In other words, Gushi County, even if the particular want government officials to share even after the election of rights, but also should design a set of image point kind of procedures to allow the public a sense of participation, see the past, think it is useful to do with their relationship. In this way, the results of the last elected before they have credibility, rather than incur a wide range of questions.



How can I be considered "decent program" mean? Now known as "Public Choice", want to come there should be more broadly representative, Or we can say there is the public will participate. Gushi County, the public can not see the election from start to finish has always been the involvement of public opinion, are among current and former officials, "Public Choice", needless to say the selection of the general public, that is, the ordinary cadres inside the county can not participate in the selection, Such a "public election" is clearly not a representative of the broad, far from public participation. The list came out, elected people's delineation, but also a coterie of the game, so programming does not want to speculate on people criticized bad if it tried.



Can be a closer look at another one of "public election." August 12, Hubei Province in 2009 started interviewing the public and selecting cadres examination, and different from the past is that this interview for the first time the public opening of the judges in order to enhance the people's right of public participation in cadre selection and influence. 39 judges, there are nine leading cadre or by an expert jury composed of experts and scholars, while 30 others are the public judge, the public will account for an interview the judges scoring the total score of 20%. ( "Chutian Metropolis Daily," August 13) It was revealed that 30 popular judges, 10 were party representatives, the deputies and CPPCC members, 10 were exam-oriented units, cadres and workers who apply for and 10 people apply for units The service targets. The participation of the public judges, natural selection will make the public because of the involvement of public opinion show vigor and vitality. (This article Source: China Youth Daily)

tag:air jordan shoes jordan shoes adidas shoes converse shoes air shoes